The Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, or the Consolidated B-24 Liberator?

The Consolidated B-24 Liberator was more advanced and versatile than the Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, but we provide a fuller breakdown.

Out of the Big Three WW2 bombers (B-17, B-24, Lancaster), was the Flying Fortress the most redundant?, Page 11

Classic warbirds at Statesville Regional Airport

Among allied bomber aircraft in WWII, the B-17 is regarded as highly resistant to battle damage and B-24 more fragile. Are these reputations accurate? - Quora

Which heavy bomber did the pilots of the Luftwaffe think was the easiest one to down: the B-17, B-24, or Lancaster? - Quora

Regensburg Archives - Warfare History Network

The Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, or the Consolidated B-24 Liberator?

Billy Mitchell Archives - Warfare History Network

On a B-17 or B-24 bomber in WWII, which crew member had the greatest chance to survive and which was least likely? Or were the chances either way pretty much the same

On a B-17 or B-24 bomber in WWII, which crew member had the greatest chance to survive and which was least likely? Or were the chances either way pretty much the same

B-17 or B-24 Which was better - SASS Wire Saloon - SASS Wire Forum

Out of the Big Three WW2 bombers (B-17, B-24, Lancaster), was the Flying Fortress the most redundant?, Page 11

RADAR Archives - Page 2 of 2 - Warfare History Network

Why do we hear so much more about the B-17 as compared to the B-24 when the B-24 was built in greater numbers, carried more bombs and had better range? - Quora