Influences of heel height on human postural stability and functional  mobility between inexperienced and experienced high heel shoe wearers  [PeerJ]

Influences of heel height on human postural stability and functional mobility between inexperienced and experienced high heel shoe wearers [PeerJ]

4.8
(401)
Write Review
More
$ 19.00
Add to Cart
In stock
Description

Background High heel shoes (HHS) can affect human postural control because elevated heel height (HH) may result in plantar flexed foot and limit ankle joint range of motion during walking. Effects of HH and HHS wearing experience on postural stability during self-initiated and externally triggered perturbations are less examined in the literature. Hence, the objective of the present study is to investigate the influences of HH on human postural stability during dynamic perturbations, perceived stability, and functional mobility between inexperienced and experienced HHS wearers. Methods A total of 41 female participants were recruited (21 inexperienced HHS wearers and 20 experienced HHS wearers). Sensory organization test (SOT), motor control test (MCT), and limits of stability (LOS) were conducted to measure participant’s postural stability by using computerized dynamic posturography. Functional reach test and timed up and go test were performed to measure functional mobility. The participants’ self-perceived stability was assessed by visual analog scale. Four pairs of shoes with different HH (i.e., 0.8, 3.9, 7.0, and 10.1 cm) were applied to participants randomly. Repeated measures analysis of variance was conducted to detect the effects of HH and HHS wearing experience on each variable. Results During self-initiated perturbations, equilibrium score remarkably decreased when wearing 10.1 cm compared with flat shoes and 3.9 cm HHS. The contribution of vision to postural stability was larger in 10.1 cm HHS than in flat shoes. The use of ankle strategy worsened when HH increased to 7 cm. Similarly, the directional control of the center of gravity (COG) decreased for 7 cm HHS in LOS. Experienced wearers showed significantly higher percentage of ankle strategy and COG directional control than novices. Under externally triggered perturbations, postural stability was substantially decreased when HH reached 3.9 cm in MCT. No significant difference was found in experienced wearers compared with novices in MCT. Experienced wearers exhibited considerably better functional mobility and perceived stability with increased HH. Conclusions The use of HHS may worsen dynamic postural control and functional mobility when HH increases to 3.9 cm. Although experienced HHS wearers exhibit higher proportion of ankle strategy and COG directional control, the experience may not influence overall human postural control. Sensory organization ability, ankle strategy and COG directional control might provide useful information in developing a safety system and prevent HHS wearers from falling.

Saint-Pierre-Montlimart Mines D'or De La Bellière Les Machines

fig-1-small.jpg

The Relationship Between Arch Height and Arch Flexibility in

High Heeled Shoes: A Real Pain – Functional Performance Systems (FPS)

The Dangers of Wearing High Heels (for Athletes) - Breaking Muscle

Biomechanics of Occupation and Sport (BOS) Laboratory

Weightlifting Movement Assessment Optimization Mobility Stability

Frontiers Predicting vertical ground reaction forces from 3D

A smart insole system capable of identifying proper heel raise

PDF) Influences of heel height on human postural stability and

The Relationship Between Arch Height and Arch Flexibility in