Dual ProGlide versus ProGlide and FemoSeal for vascular access haemostasis  after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Dual ProGlide versus ProGlide and FemoSeal for vascular access haemostasis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

4.5
(562)
Write Review
More
$ 20.50
Add to Cart
In stock
Description

This study compared outcomes of 874 patients who received either two ProGlide devices or one ProGlide plus one FemoSeal for vascular closure after transfemoral TAVI, finding reduced complications with the combination approach.

Vascular News 92 – November 2021 by BIBA Publishing - Issuu

Propensity-matched comparison of vascular closure devices after transcatheter aortic valve replacement using MANTA versus ProGlide

Safety and Effectiveness of a Sequential Suture and Plug Vascular Closure Devices Technique for Large-Bore Access Closure after Percutaneous Endovascular Aneurysm Repair - ScienceDirect

PDF) Long-Term Evolution of Percutaneous Groin Access in Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: A Study of the Sequential Suture and Plug Vascular Closure Devices Technique

Single versus double use of a suture-based closure device for

Dry Field Closure of Large-Bore Access With Iliac Artery

Comparison of a Single Versus Double Perclose Technique for

Procedural and in-hospital outcomes stratified by Perclose±Angio

Stephan Heo, MD (@StephanHeo) / X

PDF) Long-Term Evolution of Percutaneous Groin Access in Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: A Study of the Sequential Suture and Plug Vascular Closure Devices Technique

Frontiers Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: All

Arteriotomy Closure Devices for Cardiovascular Procedures

Dual ProGlide versus ProGlide and FemoSeal for vascular access