Forests with multiple tree species are 70% more effective as carbon sinks  than monoculture forests

Forests with multiple tree species are 70% more effective as carbon sinks than monoculture forests

4.6
(395)
Write Review
More
$ 17.99
Add to Cart
In stock
Description

Global Forest Coalition The End of False Solutions: Moving Towards Rights-Based and Gender Transformative Solutions to Climate Change - Global Forest Coalition

Biodiverse forests store double the carbon of monoculture forests

Forests could absorb much more carbon, but does it matter?

PDF) Higher aboveground carbon stocks in mixed-species planted forests than monocultures – a meta-analysis

Nature-Based Solutions Initiative

70% More Effective: The Carbon-Sinking Superpower of Multi-Species Forests

Small forest growers in tropical landscapes should be embraced as partners for Green-growth: Increase wood supply, restore land, reduce poverty, and mitigate climate change - ScienceDirect

Twenty-year study confirms California forests are healthier when burned — or thinned : r/science

Biodiversity: Tree plantations with diverse species grow better than monocultures

How Forests Near and Far Benefit People in Cities

Drones help solve forest carbon capture riddle

If a forest has a variety of tree species, is it better at fighting climate change? A U of A study says yes

Mixed Forests Store 70% More Carbon Than Monoculture Forests