The influence of knee position on ankle dorsiflexion - a biometric study, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

The influence of knee position on ankle dorsiflexion - a biometric study, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

4.8
(775)
Write Review
More
$ 16.99
Add to Cart
In stock
Description

Background Musculus gastrocnemius tightness (MGT) can be diagnosed by comparing ankle dorsiflexion (ADF) with the knee extended and flexed. Although various measurement techniques exist, the degree of knee flexion needed to eliminate the effect of the gastrocnemius on ADF is still unknown. The aim of this study was to identify the minimal degree of knee flexion required to eliminate the restricting effect of the musculus gastrocnemius on ADF. Methods Bilateral ADF of 20 asymptomatic volunteers aged 18-40 years (50% female) was assessed prospectively at six different degrees of knee flexion (0°, 20°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 75°, Lunge). Tests were performed following a standardized protocol, non weightbearing and weightbearing, by two observers. Statistics comprised of descriptive statistics, t-tests, repeated measurement ANOVA and ICC. Results 20 individuals with a mean age of 27 ± 4 years were tested. No significant side to side differences were observed. The average ADF [95% confidence interval] for non weightbearing was 4° [1°-8°] with the knee extended and 20° [16°-24°] for the knee 75° flexed. Mean weightbearing ADF was 25° [22°-28°] for the knee extended and 39° [36°-42°] for the knee 75° flexed. The mean differences between 20° knee flexion and full extension were 15° [12°-18°] non weightbearing and 13° [11°-16°] weightbearing. Significant differences of ADF were only found between full extension and 20° of knee flexion. Further knee flexion did not increase ADF. Conclusion Knee flexion of 20° fully eliminates the ADF restraining effect of the gastrocnemius. This knowledge is essential to design a standardized clinical examination assessing MGT.

PDF) A randomised cross over study to evaluate the performance of a novel ankle dorsiflexion measurement device for novice users

Reliability and Accuracy of Biomechanical Measurements of the Lower Extremities in: Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association Volume 92 Issue 6 (2002)

Foot and Ankle Assessment-Investigations and Tests - Physiopedia

Inter-rater reliability and validity of angle measurements using smartphone applications for weight-bearing ankle dorsiflexion range of motion measurements - ScienceDirect

Reliability and Accuracy of Biomechanical Measurements of the

Reliability of ultrasonographic measurement of muscle architecture

PDF) Effect of subtalar joint position on the measurement of maximum ankle dorsiflexic

Reliability of ultrasonographic measurement of muscle architecture

A scoping review of portable sensing for out-of-lab anterior cruciate ligament injury prevention and rehabilitation

PDF) Effect of subtalar joint position on the measurement of maximum ankle dorsiflexic

Reliability of Clinical Tests of Foot and Ankle Characteristics in

PDF) Restricted ankle dorsiflexion: methods to assess and improve joint function

Gastrocnemius tightness: A population based observational study - ScienceDirect