Download scientific diagram | This mammograph provides a 2-dimensional rendering of the mean breast measurements for all patients undergo- ing a breast reduction plus implants. The frontal views (A, B) demonstrate nonboxy lower poles. The areolae are reduced in size. The lateral views (C, D) show a 12% reduction in total breast area. There is a greater increase in breast projection (1.6 cm) and upper-pole projection (1.8 cm) compared with breast reduction alone. The breast parenchymal ratio is favor- able (i.e., >1.5). The nipple is slightly overelevated (0.6 cm above the apex). BME indicates breast mound elevation; BPR, breast parenchymal ratio; LPR, lower-pole ratio; MPost, maximum postoperative breast projection. from publication: Breast Reduction versus Breast Reduction Plus Implants: A Comparative Study with Measurements and Outcomes | Breast reduction is well-known to provide an improvement in physical symptoms. However, measurements show that this procedure is less effective in restoring upper-pole fullness. Breast implants effectively augment the upper pole. This study was undertaken to determine the | breast, Breast Implants and Patients | ResearchGate, the professional network for scientists.
PDF) Breast Reduction versus Breast Reduction Plus Implants: A
This mammograph provides a 2-dimensional rendering of the mean
PDF) Breast Reduction versus Breast Reduction Plus Implants: A
This mammograph provides a 2-dimensional rendering of the mean
PDF) Breast Reduction versus Breast Reduction Plus Implants: A
Breast Reduction versus Breast Reduction Plus Implants: A
PDF) Breast Reduction versus Breast Reduction Plus Implants: A
PDF) Breast Reduction versus Breast Reduction Plus Implants: A
Breast Reduction versus Breast Reduction Plus Implants: A