Download scientific diagram | Continuously expandable interbody spacer in (A) minimized and (B) expanded forms (RISE-L Globus Medical, Inc, Audubon, PA). from publication: Comparative Effectiveness of Expandable Versus Static Interbody Spacers via MIS LLIF: A 2-Year Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Study | Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Objective The purpose of this study is to compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of expandable interbody spacers to static interbody spacers. Methods This is a retrospective, institutional review board–exempt chart review of | Static, Mullerian Inhibiting Substance (MIS) and Outcome Assessment (Health Care) | ResearchGate, the professional network for scientists.
Continuously expandable interbody spacer in (A) minimized and (B)
Asian Spine Journal
Medicina, Free Full-Text
ProLift® Interbody Spacer System, Spine Products
Three-dimensional finite element model aligned to its loaded neutral
Oblique view of a continuously expandable interbody spacer in minimized
Brain Sciences, Free Full-Text
James Towner's research works University of Rochester, Rochester (UR) and other places
Survival of the TAR in years. At 2,5 years 29 were at risk and at 5