Dual ProGlide versus ProGlide and FemoSeal for vascular access

Dual ProGlide versus ProGlide and FemoSeal for vascular access

4.5
(727)
Write Review
More
$ 10.99
Add to Cart
In stock
Description

This study compared outcomes of 874 patients who received either two ProGlide devices or one ProGlide plus one FemoSeal for vascular closure after transfemoral TAVI, finding reduced complications with the combination approach.

Efficacy and Safety of ProGlide Versus Prostar XL Vascular Closure Devices in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The RISPEVA Registry

Alberto P. on LinkedIn: Dual ProGlide versus ProGlide and FemoSeal for vascular access haemostasis…

/cms/10.2217/fca-2020-0065/a

/cms/10.2217/fca-2020-0065/a

PDF) A Stopped Pilot Study of the ProGlide Closure Device After Transbrachial Endovascular Interventions

Procedural and in-hospital outcomes stratified by Perclose±Angio-Seal.

Vascular Closure Devices For Axillary Artery Access: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis - Alex Koziarz, Sean A. Kennedy, Ghassan Awad El-Karim, Kong T. Tan, George D. Oreopoulos, Sanjog Kalra, Christian D. Etz

Alberto P. on LinkedIn: Dual ProGlide versus ProGlide and FemoSeal for vascular access haemostasis…

Terumo Femoseal

An upfront combined strategy for endovascular haemostasis in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation. - Abstract - Europe PMC

STEP Study: A Randomized Trial Comparing Polymer Versus Suture-Based Vascular Closure Devices for Arterial Closure Following Lower-Limb Arterial Endovascular Revascularization

Histologic and Duplex Comparison of the Perclose and Angio-Seal Percutaneous Closure Devices

Frontiers Comparison of percutaneous closure systems for large bore vascular access sites in endovascular procedures

An upfront combined strategy for endovascular haemostasis in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation