Many people writing about the new Captain America: Civil War have commented on what seems to them a fundamental irony driving the story: that Tony Stark, the self-described “genius billionaire playboy philanthropist” who always does his own thing, agrees to the Sokovia Accords that place the Avengers under international political control, while Steve Rogers, Captain America, the devoted servant of his country, refuses to sign them and basically goes rogue. But I don’t think there’s any real irony here, for two reasons. The first and simplest reason is that the destruction of Sokovia, which we saw in Avengers: Age of
MCU: Ranking and Explaining 10 Nicknames Tony Stark Gave Other MCU
Tony Stark Suits Up as Iron Man with New The Avengers Hot Toys Figure
Iron Man (comic book) - Wikipedia
Tony Stark's big plan during the civil war [Civil War: Front Line #11] : r/Marvel
MCU: Iron Man's 10 Biggest Failures, Ranked
Iron Man Vs Captain America: The First Avenger - Which Movie Is
Tony Stark Suits Up as Iron Man with New The Avengers Hot Toys Figure
JOKER STUDIO JS001 1/6 Iron Man Tony Stark Hologram Head Sculpt
WHEN IRON MAN (TONY STARK) WAS ANT MAN What if Tony Stark never
Namor Is Secretly Richer Than Tony Stark (& It's Not Close)
ELITE TOYS 1/6 Tony Stark Iron Man Head Sculpt fit 12inches
Eoin Colfer to give Iron Man 'the Dublin treatment', Eoin Colfer
1/6 Iron Man Tony Stark Head Sculpt Blood Head Carved fit 12